New GeForce GTX 465 Hits the Streets

By Drew Henry on May 31 2010 in 3D Vision, Corporate, Gaming
16 Comments 16 Comments

Heads up GeForce fans. The GeForce GTX 465 based on our latest Fermi architecture is now available for even more gamers. It’s available for purchase now from add-in-card companies including ASUS, Colorful, EVGA, Galaxy, Gigabyte, Gainward, MSI, Palit, PNY, Zotac and others, with a target price of $279.

This new price point means that even more gamers can experience “DX11 Done Right” and 3D Vision on their PCs.

Additional features for the GTX 465 include:

11 dedicated tessellation engines
Support for Blu-ray 3D, with GPU decoding for enhanced 3D movie playback and 3D Internet streaming
NVIDIA SLI(R), the most popular multi-GPU solution for gamers
NVIDIA PhysX(R) which brings dynamic realism to PC gaming
Next-generation CUDA architecture, with support for CUDA C/C++, DirectCompute, & OpenCL

Enjoy the latest games like Metro 2033 & Just Cause 2 as well as the upcoming Mafia 2 and Lost Planet 2 in the “Way They are Meant to be Played!”

We hope you like the new addition to the Fermi family.

As always, happy gaming.

Tagged: 3D, asus, Computex, Events, Gaming, GeForce

Share:

16 Comments Post a Comment

Similar Stories

Omar

nVidia ROCKS ! great work people you are the best forever .
Mike

Almost a year late *yawn* this ones still probably an overpriced power hungry jet engine.
Ryan

Awesome, time to upgrade my 9800GT indeed.
Netsguru

Greate now make a 490 gtx to beat ati’s best card
Omar

Yeah please you have to beat ATI’s A**ES , the (HD 5970) in performance and memory :S !
http://profile.typepad.com/anthonylim Anthony Lim

$279 seems a bit too much.
http://profile.typepad.com/fatandhorny mazty

And why wouldn’t I go for the HD5850? Come on, stop messing around & get the GF104 out. The benchmarks show the card to be worse than the competition and here in the UK more expensive. Hot, power hungry and expensive, with not the performance. With the “success” of Fermi in HPHPC I’d have really thought Nvidia would have a much wiser marketing strategy.
Scotty

279 is peanuts, glad we aren’t living in the days when graphics cards were 550 bucks, now that was over priced.
http://profile.typepad.com/codybrandt Cody Brandt

They already are. It’s a dual GPU card, using the chips from the 470, the clocks are slightly lower but that’s so you don’t need your own nuclear power plant to use it.
Adam

Why buy this when you could buy an ATI 5850? ATI is just so much better right now. nVidia is half a year late, their cards run hot, consume way to much power and cost more than older ATI cards which still out perform them. nVidia was great back in the day of the 8800, which is still a great card, but they have become to focused on their proprietary technologies and the quality of the hardware has gone down. Sorry to sound like an ATI fan-boy, but I have been very disappointed by this series.
Jesus

dont talk about ati`s at nvidia… , you are free to use whatever you think is better, reserve that kind of comments or post them at Ati
Flybyhacker

What important know is Nvidia doing something to keep up the race with ATI
and Physx and CUDA is great anyway
Flybyhacker

now*(sorry)
AsKaRi timboo

Id rather get nvidia than ati, besides the price difference aint that much, plus u get the extra stuff i.e Phys x and Cuda all in one card.
Yhon Travolta

ATI is all about shaders, and we all know how much games can gain out of a programmable gpu like NVIDIA’s, open your eyes.
Steve

Personally i feel the GTX 465 to be a big let down on Nvidia’s part. I expected a card which had at least enough performance to compete with the 5850, considering it’s priced the same ($10 less in the US, about £20 more in the UK). The power consumption is an issue because it consumes almost as much as the GTX 470, which is a much better card. The temps are also as high, and since it’s now summer it’s already quite hot and when i’m playing Borderlands for example, i can feel the room heating up (Custom cooled GTX 260). I was looking to upgrade my graphics card to join in with the DX11 bandwagon, but it seems that so far Nvidia’s offerings just arn’t worth it in my opinion because i want the best bang for my buck possible. I would consider the GTX 470, if it was priced about £250, however at 300 and above, it’s as much as the 5870, which is a much better card overall. The Physx and CUDA just can’t justify a reason for owning a Fermi-based product so far. I think i’ll wait for a refreash before i buy a Fermi… and untill then i think i’ll get myself a 5850. All i have to say is that this GTX 465 is yet another disappointment for Nvidia fans and potential new customers alike. Come on Nvidia, stop being so focused on the high end market and overpricing your products for things like Physx and focus more on the mainstream-performance section.
Sorry for the rant, just wanted to know let them know my opinions.. i doubt anybody from Nv wil even read this lol.